Here's the following problem; I have 70 assets (e.g. stocks) and each has a given 'quality' score. These assets are also described by their equivalent market caps (e.g. P*Q of stocks) or 'value'.
I need an advanced statistician, ideally with xp in finance, to combine the two in a new score, that is non-distortive (as a %*mcap is). Here's a little more on what's expected here:
- Show alternative routes - this might include (but not limited to) different types of normalization etc.
- Experiment with score or market cap percentiles (scoring bands) - capture the 'apples to apples' comparisons.
Consider the following: 2 assets (A & B) that score in the 60%-65% band. (A) has $10m mcap, (B) has 100m mcap. (A) is likely to be undervalued compared to (B).
Now consider the following: Asset (A) from before and a new one (C) which scores in the 50%-55% scoring band, and has a market cap of $8m.
There is a clear relationship between (A) and (C) - similar band in mcap, choose (A) because of higher score, but an unclear one between (B) and (C) - how much of the mcap difference is 'explainable' by the score?
This is exactly what I need the new metric to solve for!
Thank you :)
About the recuiterMember since May 20, 2018 Navin Kumar
from Podkarpackie, Poland